Electoral Quota Adoption & Transnational Activism

My latest article, co-authored with Kathleen Fallon at Stony Brook University, is available for advance access at Politics & Gender:

Abstract: Electoral quotas are a key factor in increasing women’s political representation in parliaments globally. Despite the strong effects of quotas, less attention has been paid to the factors that prompt countries to adopt electoral quotas across developing countries. This article employs event history modeling to analyze quota adoption in 134 developing countries from 1987 to 2012, focusing on quota type, transnational activism, and norm cascades. The article asks the following questions: (1) How might quota adoption differ according to quota type—nonparty versus party quotas? (2) How has the 1995 Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing, China (Beijing 95), contributed to quota diffusion? (3) Do global, regional, or neighboring country effects contribute more to quota adoption? Results provide new evidence of how quota adoption processes differ according to quota type, the central role played by participation in Beijing 95, and how increased global counts contribute to faster nonparty quota adoption while increased neighboring country counts lead to faster to party quota adoption.

 

SwissFallon2016 1

Opaque Transparency & Canada’s Foreign Aid Program

Stephen Brown (University of Ottawa) and I have written a short comment on issues of transparency in Canada’s foreign aid program for The McLeod Group.  Our thoughts in the piece stemmed from discussion during a panel at the recent Canadian Association for the Study of International Development (CASID) meetings.  Hopefully Canada can do even more to increase the transparency of not only its aid data, but also its policies and processes moving ahead.

You can read the piece here:

OPAQUE TRANSPARENCY IN CANADA’S FOREIGN AID

 

 

From “Gender Equality” to “Equality between Women & Men”

 

The shift in language about women and gender equality witnessed at the former CIDA under the former Harper government provoked significant concern and discussion at the time.  The prime concern here was that eschewing talk of gender equality was likely to have a negative effect on the prioritization of these issues in Canada’s aid program.

Figure 1.

Figure 1. Percent of Active Projects by CIDA GE Marker Category, 2005-2012 (HPD Dataset)

A former student (Jessica Barry) and I decided to examine whether that shift in language was borne out in the spending patterns seen immediately prior to and following this shift in discourse.  To answer this question, we analyzed the available data on Canadian aid spending to see if more or less aid was being spent on issue of gender equality in this period. The takeaway from our analysis was that the discursive shift did not appear to translate to a noticeable decline in spending on gender at the former CIDA, suggesting that the aid agency showed some resilience to the politicization of language it faced.

This research will soon appear in Rebecca Tiessen and Stephen Baranyi’s new edited book  Canada’s commitments to gender and development in the Global South to be published later this year by McGill-Queen’s University Press.

 

 

Download (PDF, 219KB)

Canada Should Act to Facilitate & Amplify Remittances

NOTE: This post originally appeared on the CCIC’s Development Unplugged Blog at the Huffington Post.

 

On the cusp of the first budget of the second Trudeau-era, Canadians still await a clear indication of how the new Liberal government will engage on foreign aid and development. There have been encouraging signs:  more aid to the refugee crisis; more aid to climate change adaptation; a relaxing of the adversarial approach to civil society. Still, what stamp the Liberals will place on Canadian aid and its role in our foreign policy remains a matter for speculation.

Advocates have argued for more aid, better aid, and moving beyond aid,. Certainly, all such aims have their merits, but one area in the ‘beyond aid’ context that has received less attention is the matter of remittances.

Unlike many forms of aid or investment, remittances have the potential to rapidly affect the lives of those who receive them.

What is a remittance?  Simply put, the process of sending money internationally from Canada to a friend or family member in a foreign country.  Globally, the flows of remittances have grown substantially in recent years.  Even with a projected slowdown in 2015, the World Bank recently predicted total remittances to ‘developing countries’ would exceed $435 Billion USD. To put it in context, official development assistance/foreign aid in 2014 was estimated at just over $135 Billion USD globally.

The growing gap between remittances and official aid is a telling indicator of why so many in the international development community are increasingly interested in the potential of remittances as an alternate form of financing for development. Unlike many forms of aid or investment, remittances have the potential to rapidly affect the lives of those who receive them.  Surveys in several African countries show, for example, that remittances are used for everything from everyday essentials like food and shelter to starting a businesses or education fees.

Remittances certainly are not guaranteed to end up in the pockets of the poorest. Unlike aid, there is no set of conditions on remittances that require them to be spent on combatting poverty or ‘development’; but emerging evidence from across the Global South suggests that remittances can play a key role in doing so.  By linking communities and families in their home countries to the resources generated by migrants globally, a key foreign source of income is introduced into society.

 

 

Migrant Remittance Outflows

Figure 1

In Canada, remittances to low- and middle-income countries have grown significantly over the past decade. Estimates from the World Bank suggest that remittance outflows from migrants to Canada topped $5.6 Billion USD in 2013 (See Fig. 1), and that total remittances from Canada to low- and middle-income countries exceeded that amount significantly (see Fig. 2).

Estimated Bilateral Remittances, 2014

Figure 2

With the extent of remittances likely to grow further, Canada needs to explore ways in which our support for development globally might build on these resources.  As a private flow of funds, governments have limited opportunities to leverage remittances use for development finance.  Still, as others have argued (here & here), there are ways Canada could take innovative steps to both facilitate and amplify the effects of remittances in low- and middle-income countries.

First, Canada can do more to make its Budget 2015 promise to facilitate access lower-cost means through which to send remittances abroad a reality. World Bank research and databases show that the costs of sending remittances vary widely, with the highest costs of sending remittance often experienced when remitting to sub-Saharan Africa and East Asia.

The costs of sending money to the highest volume remittance countries from Canada also vary widely, with 2015 estimates suggesting rates higher than 8% for China and Vietnam or around 5% for the Philippines. Considering the scale of remittances to these countries, these costs amount to hundreds of millions of dollars taken from the hard-earned Canadians and other immigrants.

The new Canadian government should continue efforts to reduce the cost of remittances to reduce this burden, and in a sense, increase the amount available to remit.  Whether through regulating sending costs or implementing tax credits to offset fees for remittance to low- and middle-income countries, Canada should do more to facilitate remittances, wherever their destination.

Second, Canada should look to amplify the remittances its residents already send abroad to low- and middle-income countries.  This would serve to increase: (1) incentives to remit, and (2) the level of remittance flows.  Some form of matching remittances to eligible low- and middle-income countries would go a ways to achieving this amplification.

Many remittance receiving countries have tried to incentivize and channel remittances in this way, most notably a program in Mexico where the government matched remittances on a 3 to 1 basis, providing $3 for investment in local infrastructure for every dollar remitted.  International organizations have also experimented with matching on the recipient side to encourage the use of remittances for development. Indeed, a recent study shows that remittance matching holds promise as a means to channel resources towards education.

To amplify remittances, Canada could fund low- and middle-income countries to establish remittance matching programs; and even target those programs to specifically leverage remittances from Canada. Such a program could be managed through Canada’s foreign aid program with little difficulty. Likewise, the Canadian government could implement personal incentives through tax credits or matching grants to increase remittances by private individual remitters. Such programs could increase remittances from Canada to families and communities in receiving countries looking to expand development financing.

Immigrants and diaspora groups in Canada make a central contribution to the Canadian economy and society.

Central to increased support for remittances is a willingness by Canadians and our government to relax the conditions and expectations we sometimes place on our limited foreign aid funds.  Increasingly, evidence from around the globe suggests that cash transfers with little or no conditions are put to good use by individuals and businesses in developing economies.

Do not get me wrong, we should not replace aid with increased support for remittances.  Instead, Canada should look to supplement and diversify its support for development globally by allocating new resources to support remittances.  Beyond government interventions, there is potentially a role here for community groups, associations, and NGOs in Canada to mobilize attention to the importance of remittances to development and to further expand the base of remittance funds sent from Canada in the future.

Immigrants and diaspora groups in Canada make a central contribution to the Canadian economy and society.  As the level of remittances shows, in many cases, they also continue to contribute to the economic and social development of their home communities and countries. As a means of expanding Canada’s support for development beyond aid, the government should look to work with Canadians and migrants alike to facilitate and amplify this increasingly important source of development finance.

 

Liam Swiss (@liamswiss) is assistant professor in the Department of Sociology at Memorial University. He researches and teaches about foreign aid, gender and development.

 

 

(For more data on Canadian remittance flows see here: http://cidpnsi.ca/remittances-explorer/)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

World Society and the Global Foreign Aid Network

2005Outdegree

Global Bilateral Aid Network, 2005 (Sized by in- and out-degree centrality)

Several years ago I received funding from the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC) to study the global foreign aid network.  I have published several pieces that resulted from that project, and continue to study aid from a network perspective.  One piece that emerged from that project is titled “World Society and the Global Foreign Aid Network” – an article which has been accepted for publication in the new ASA section journal Sociology of Development.  Having been through more revisions than I care to admit, this article examines whether aid network centrality – how plugged into the global aid network a recipient country is – is associated with other measures of global connectedness or embeddedness in World Society.

The takeaway point from the article is that the more donors from which a country receives aid, the greater the number of ties that country is likely to have to the international human rights architecture, international NGOs, and other international organizations in the future.  In the paper I start to explore the role aid donors may play in brokering these connections for recipient country partners – a topic that is a focus of my ongoing research.

The final submission version of the article is downloadable below, or on my research website.

Download (PDF, 1.05MB)